Home › Ideas

Ideas index: 18 proposals to fix college football

Each distinct proposal in the archive, with who has supported or opposed it. Names link to person pages; each proposal page lists the underlying sourced entries. “Predicts” means the person forecast it without necessarily endorsing it.

Ideas index · Outside proposals (3)

Also see Outside proposals: 3 full reform plans from fans, writers and advocacy sites (not insiders), listed separately under each related idea.

  1. A commissioner or single central authority for college football
  2. Power 4 breakaway, super league or separate top division
  3. Players as employees, unions or collective bargaining
  4. Direct pay or revenue sharing with players
  5. A hard salary or revenue cap
  6. A federal law, national NIL standard or antitrust protection
  7. Transfer limits and portal calendar reform
  8. Eligibility: five-year clock, JUCO years, draft age
  9. Playoff expansion to 16, 24 or more teams
  10. Fixed title-game site at the Rose Bowl
  11. Calendar reform: shorter season, sacred Saturdays
  12. Scheduling: standardize schedules, reward tough non-conference games
  13. Preserve rivalries; geography-based conferences via pooled media rights
  14. An NFL-funded developmental or minor league
  15. Enforce the rules and remove donors
  16. Health, medical and scholarship protections
  17. Tie benefits to education
  18. Regulate agents

1. A commissioner or single central authority for college football

2. Power 4 breakaway, super league or separate top division

Outside proposals

Full reform plans from fans, writers and advocacy sites, not insiders. Kept separate from the sourced insider entries above.

3. Players as employees, unions or collective bargaining

4. Direct pay or revenue sharing with players

5. A hard salary or revenue cap

6. A federal law, national NIL standard or antitrust protection

7. Transfer limits and portal calendar reform

Outside proposals

Full reform plans from fans, writers and advocacy sites, not insiders. Kept separate from the sourced insider entries above.

8. Eligibility: five-year clock, JUCO years, draft age

9. Playoff expansion to 16, 24 or more teams

Outside proposals

Full reform plans from fans, writers and advocacy sites, not insiders. Kept separate from the sourced insider entries above.

10. Fixed title-game site at the Rose Bowl

Outside proposals

Full reform plans from fans, writers and advocacy sites, not insiders. Kept separate from the sourced insider entries above.

11. Calendar reform: shorter season, sacred Saturdays

Outside proposals

Full reform plans from fans, writers and advocacy sites, not insiders. Kept separate from the sourced insider entries above.

12. Scheduling: standardize schedules, reward tough non-conference games

Outside proposals

Full reform plans from fans, writers and advocacy sites, not insiders. Kept separate from the sourced insider entries above.

13. Preserve rivalries; geography-based conferences via pooled media rights

Outside proposals

Full reform plans from fans, writers and advocacy sites, not insiders. Kept separate from the sourced insider entries above.

14. An NFL-funded developmental or minor league

15. Enforce the rules and remove donors

16. Health, medical and scholarship protections

17. Tie benefits to education

18. Regulate agents

Recurring themes, common proposals and disagreements

Recurring themes - "Nobody is in charge." Coaches and pundits have said this for years: Ferentz in 2022 and 2023, Swinney's "adults have left the room," Dillingham's "we've created a mess," Frost's "broken," and Saban's "messed up." Proposed answers split three ways: a single commissioner, federal law (the SCORE Act and the Protect College Sports Act), or conference self-governance, the SEC/Big Ten "Plan B." - Movement is now seen as a bigger problem than money. Many who accept paying players (Saban, Cam Newton, Kirby Smart, Archie Manning, Desmond Howard, Deion Sanders) now focus on free transfers and tampering. Remedies on the table: portal windows outside the season (Kiffin, Smart, Lanning), one free transfer (Pollack, the PCSA), and multi-year lock-ins or contracts (Clay Travis, Cam Newton). - The amateurism defense collapsed. Brand (2006–08), Emmert (2011, 2019), Larry Scott (2014), Gene Smith (2019) and Tebow (2019) defended the old model. By 2026 Gordon Gee was telling the Senate that the NCAA and conferences "lost in the courts because we failed to allow student athletes to... monetize their talents." - Players found a collective voice. The line runs from Kain Colter's 2014 union push, through #WeAreUnited and #WeWantToPlay in 2020 (Daltoso, Hobbs, Lawrence, Fields, Rencher), the Johnson, Alston and House suits, Athletes.org, and the CFBPA platform, to a current player (Holtzclaw) testifying to the Senate in 2026. - Playoff creep, predicted and delivered. In 2008–12 Delany, Tranghese and Gee warned of a "slippery slope." The 4-team CFP came in 2014, 12 teams in 2024, and by 2026 16- and 24-team models were being debated. - Realignment has cost rivalries and regional identity. Examples: Texas–Texas A&M (2011), the Pac-16 attempt (2010), Bowlsby's accusation against ESPN (2021), and the Pac-12 collapse (2023). Cody Campbell proposes pooled media rights so that conferences can regroup geographically.

Most common proposals 1. A commissioner or central authority for college football. 2. A federal NIL framework with limited antitrust protection. 3. A salary or revenue cap that is actually enforced. 4. Transfer limits and a portal calendar that doesn't overlap the season. 5. A bigger playoff (16 or 24) or, alternatively, a shorter calendar. 6. A separate top tier or super league. 7. Employment and collective bargaining as the stabilizer (the players' side) versus a statutory ban on employee status (the administrators' side).

Notable disagreements - Commissioner. For: Saban, Deion Sanders, Elko, Franklin, and Kiffin (who backs Saban for the job). Skeptics: Kirby Smart ("nice in theory") and Urban Meyer ("you don't need more people, you need to enforce the rules"). - Employee status. For, or sympathetic: Colter, Huma, Chase Griffin, Trey Johnson, the Dartmouth players, Cavale, the CFBPA, and Archie Griffin. Against: Brand, Emmert, Larry Scott, Gene Smith, Kliavkoff ("existential threat"), Pernetti ("99 out of a hundred don't want to be employees"), and Swinney (2014). - Playoff size. Bigger: Riley, RG3, Yormark (24), Petitti and the Big Ten, Brian Kelly, and Leach (64). Caution or opposition: Sankey, Swinney ("less important season," player toll), Klieman (health), Warren (2021), Phillips (2022), and the BCS-era presidents. - Pay model. Free market: Travis Hunter and Burrow's advice to recruits. Cap: Deion Sanders, Riley, Cuban, Swinney, and Trump's equal-pay idea. Soft cap only: House plaintiffs' lawyer Berman. - Super league. Inevitable or desirable: Swinney, Herbstreit, and Mack Brown's "separate divisions." Against: Bevacqua ("horrible mistake"), Campbell ("gilded monopoly"), and Cruz, who warns of 30–50 teams. The SEC and Big Ten deny super-league plans but acknowledge conference-rules contingency talk. - Federal legislation. For: Saban, Gee, Bevacqua, Gould, Cantwell, Cruz, Jimbo Fisher, and Holtzclaw. Against: Rand Paul. SEC not committed: Sankey (June 2026).